• Welcome to The Cave of Dragonflies forums, where the smallest bugs live alongside the strongest dragons.

    Guests are not able to post messages or even read certain areas of the forums. Now, that's boring, don't you think? Registration, on the other hand, is simple, completely free of charge, and does not require you to give out any personal information at all. As soon as you register, you can take part in some of the happy fun things at the forums such as posting messages, voting in polls, sending private messages to people and being told that this is where we drink tea and eat cod.

    Of course I'm not forcing you to do anything if you don't want to, but seriously, what have you got to lose? Five seconds of your life?

Search results

  1. EvilCrazyMonkey

    Should any religious body be the sole moral authority?

    yes, we know, but how are we going to teach them? they've known it to be right for all of their lives; it's not going to be easy.
  2. EvilCrazyMonkey

    Should any religious body be the sole moral authority?

    Two problems arise from that, however: Who draws the line? Where do we draw it?
  3. EvilCrazyMonkey

    Should any religious body be the sole moral authority?

    re: no morals: I am an atheist. I have morals. bitch i win 8) This is rather simple: we have morals. That's possible, by the way. re: anarchy: Um, just no. We live in a democracy (at least i do in fagmerica); people are elected into office. And no, not by Jeebus. God's rule is to follow our...
  4. EvilCrazyMonkey

    Should any religious body be the sole moral authority?

    Harle they might not exist. :'(
  5. EvilCrazyMonkey

    Should any religious body be the sole moral authority?

    I must change my plan. My point was: it is much more common to have murder when the murderer thinks the victim is evil/inferior/whatever than it is to kill out of jealousy or pity. edit: Danni please pay attention to my whole post, specifically this part.
  6. EvilCrazyMonkey

    Should any religious body be the sole moral authority?

    What I meant is that it is basic motivation for the at least slightly mentally unstable, and because it is deeply rooted in their thoughts (most of the time they've learned of it since childhood), it makes the most sense to them. It also closely ties with moral beliefs, which are very deeply...
  7. EvilCrazyMonkey

    Should any religious body be the sole moral authority?

    In fact, many people would not do that without the religious motivation, or, at least, not nearly as easily. Religion is a simple amplification of their "craziness" or so. Dogmatic roots are the strongest. Also, it is what they have known for their entire lives, usually. It's much easier to...
  8. EvilCrazyMonkey

    Should any religious body be the sole moral authority?

    Again, this is where it boils down to the difference between stating an opinion and forcing those opinions onto others.
  9. EvilCrazyMonkey

    Should any religious body be the sole moral authority?

    Knew I should have added that in there. :| WHOOPS
  10. EvilCrazyMonkey

    Should any religious body be the sole moral authority?

    Notice the bolded part. My teacher was talking about it; I do not actually find that source extremely viable and have inserted "heard."
  11. EvilCrazyMonkey

    Should any religious body be the sole moral authority?

    Why am I evil? Because the Pope says so. I don't give a fuck what any religious body or Head of Church X says. The problem isn't with them stating what they believe; it's when their followers cross the line. Except in the case of someone extreme like Hitler, where e does much more than simply...
Back
Top Bottom